Skip to content

Conversation

@nicholascar
Copy link
Contributor

@nicholascar nicholascar commented Dec 4, 2025

  • improved description of Specification & Union profiles
  • more information about Profiles of SHACL
    • including Profiles Vocabulary profile definitions in RDF
  • start of more content in Profiling with SHACL
  • more consistent wording throughout
  • improved SHACL-SHACL shapes graphs listing in SHACL 1.2 Overview

Profiling document preview: https://raw.githack.com/w3c/data-shapes/profiling-updates/shacl12-profiling/index.html

Overview Document preview: https://raw.githack.com/w3c/data-shapes/profiling-updates/shacl12-overview/index.html

@nicholascar nicholascar self-assigned this Dec 4, 2025
@nicholascar nicholascar added the Profiles For SHACL 1.2 Profiles spec label Dec 4, 2025
<section id="hierarchies">
<h3>Profile Hierarchies</h3>
<p>
Profile hierarchies are sets of profiles where some profile the others. As per the rules of the [[[dx-prof]]], if
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
Profile hierarchies are sets of profiles where some profile the others. As per the rules of the [[[dx-prof]]], if
Profile hierarchies are arrangements in which a profile is a specialization of another, forming a chain where more specific profiles inherit constraints from broader ones. As per the rules of the [[[dx-prof]]], if

prof:hasResource
<http://www.w3.org/ns/shacl-shacl/core> ,
<https://www.w3.org/TR/shacl12-core/> ;
schema:description "This is a Profile Vocabulary Profile instance of the SHACL 1.2 Core Specification Profile" ;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm curious, why not use dcterms:description?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Profiles For SHACL 1.2 Profiles spec

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants