Skip to content

Conversation

@HolgerKnublauch
Copy link
Contributor

Closes #665

This is adding proper linkage to the definition of validation result to SHACL SPARQL.

The other issue that you mention @afs - ensuring that Core consistently uses the term "violation" - is IMHO already addressed.

@HolgerKnublauch HolgerKnublauch requested a review from afs December 3, 2025 06:44
@HolgerKnublauch HolgerKnublauch added the SPARQL For SHACL 1.2 SPARQL extensions spec label Dec 3, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

SPARQL For SHACL 1.2 SPARQL extensions spec

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Connecting SHACL-Core and SHACL-SPARQL

2 participants